# Shared-tablet attribution

Topic: Unresolved Questions
Topic URL: https://lindsay.conspirograph.com/topic/unresolved-questions
Card URL: https://lindsay.conspirograph.com/topic/unresolved-questions/card/43
Markdown URL: https://lindsay.conspirograph.com/topic/unresolved-questions/card/43.md
Updated: 2026-08-12T03:37:55.167Z

Notice: This archive documents claims, it does not automatically endorse them.

#### Card #07: Shared-tablet attribution

- URL: https://lindsay.conspirograph.com/topic/unresolved-questions/card/43
- Markdown: https://lindsay.conspirograph.com/topic/unresolved-questions/card/43.md
- Topic: Unresolved Questions
- Updated: 2026-08-12T03:37:55.167Z
- Comments: 0

Summary:

Why device possession is not user attribution.

Body:

[VERIFIED FACT] A March 2023 affidavit described a tablet found on the kitchen counter as shared and accessible to both Lindsay and Patrick. [Warrant packet](https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/Linday%20Clancy%20Search%20Warrant.pdf)

[UNKNOWN] The public packet does not provide a full user-attribution report tying every activity on that device to one person. [Warrant packet](https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/Linday%20Clancy%20Search%20Warrant.pdf)

Links:
- https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/Linday%20Clancy%20Search%20Warrant.pdf

Attachments:
- No approved attachments on this card.